In response to an article we published called "What Is(n't) 'Your Work' in the CGL?," we got a response from a reader (see below) that resulted in a promise to further explore the CGL workmanship exclusions and the trend in some legal jurisdictions to deny coverage based, not on an exclusion, but the failure of the insuring agreement to be triggered because the claim does not involve an "occurrence" and/or "property damage." So, here we go.....

​